Weldon Holtzclaw, Jr. v. Medical Staff Greenville County Detention Center

25-6887United States Court Of Appeals For The 4th Circuit27.07.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 25-6887

WELDON EUGENE HOLTZCLAW, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEDICAL STAFF OF GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER;
NURSE HORTON; UNNAMED SUPERVISOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (6:25-cv -01414-DCC)

Submitted: July 23, 2026 Decided: July 27, 2026

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Holtzclaw’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint for failure to comply with court orders. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holtzclaw’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir.
2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our
review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”).
Accordingly, we deny Holtzclaw’s pending appellate motions, and we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.