Third Circuit disposition — 211096np-pdf

HLD-004 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 21-1096
___________
IN RE: IFEDOO NOBLE ENIGWE,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 2:19-cv-12631)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
February 25, 2021
Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, CHAGARES and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: March 12, 2021)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Ifedoo Enigwe filed in the District Court a motion for relief from judgment under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Before this Court is a petition for a writ of mandamus in which
Enigwe requests that we compel the District Court to act on his Rule 60(b) motion.
Because the District Court has since ruled on the Rule 60(b) motion, Enigwe’s mandamus
* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
petition will be dismissed as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d
690, 699-700 (3d Cir. 1996).

-- 2 of 2 --