Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
054330pa-pdf•Nos. 05-4330/4331/4332 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN VITILLO, VITILLO CORPORATION and VITILLO ENGINEERING, INC
054330pa-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit25.06.2007
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 05-4330/4331/4332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JOHN VITILLO, VITILLO CORPORATION and
VITILLO ENGINEERING, INC.
Appellants.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 03-cr-00555-1)
District Judge: Hon. R. Barclay Surrick
Argued December 11, 2006
Before: SMITH and ROTH, Circuit Judges,
*IRENAS, District Judge
(Opinion filed June 25, 2007)
*Honorable Joseph E. Irenas, United States District Judge for the District of New
Jersey, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION
IT IS ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case, filed on June 25,
2007, be amended as follows:
On page 21 of the first full paragraph, delete the last sentence:
“Counsel also informed us that it was not uncommon for
prosecutors to accompany agents into the field and later
serve as trial counsel, provided that the prosecutors
waited in the car while the search warrants were being issued.”
and replace with:
“Counsel also informed us that it was unusual, although not
unheard of, for prosecutors to accompany agents into the field
and later serve as trial counsel.”
By the Court,
/s/ Jane R. Roth
Circuit Judge
Dated: August 10, 2007
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.