Third Circuit disposition — 043928np-pdf

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
NO. 04-3928
IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/
FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE)
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Deborah Badarzynski
Appellant
On Appeal From the United States
District Court
For the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. MDL 1203)
District Judge: Hon. Harvey Bartle, III
Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
June 6, 2005
BEFORE: AMBRO, STAPLETON and ALARCON,*
Circuit Judges
(Filed: June 8, 2005)
* Honorable Arthur L. Alarcon, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting
by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

Ms. Badarzynski had actual notice of the deadline for registration and learned ten1
days before the deadline that her attorney may have failed to effectuate her registration as
she intended. She nevertheless waited over six months to advise the Trust of her desire to
register. Thus, this case is far different from In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Prods. Liab.
Litig., 246 F.3d 315 (3d Cir. 2001).
2
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
In order to register for benefits under the Settlement Agreement in the Diet Drug
Class Actions, appellant Deborah Badarzynski was required to return her Blue Form to
the AHP Settlement Trust (“Trust”) by May 3, 2003. She did not do this until November
21, 2003. Applying the “excusable neglect” standard set forth in Pioneer Inv. Serv. Co. v.
Brunswick Assoc. Ltd., 507 U.S. 380 (1993), the District Court concluded that
Badarzynski’s untimely filing was not attributable to such neglect. We find the analysis
set forth in its opinion persuasive and cannot say that the District Court abused its
discretion.1
The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

-- 2 of 2 --