Salvatore Coraggioso v. JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States

PRECEDENTIAL
Filed January 29, 2004
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 03-1075
SALVATORE CORAGGIOSO
Petitioner
v.
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States,
Respondent
On Appeal from an Order Entered in
The Board of Immigration Appeals
(No. A77 035 208)
Argued October 28, 2003
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, NYGAARD and
AMBRO, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed January 23, 2004)
John D. Perez, Esquire (Argued)
41-51 Wilson Avenue
Newark, NJ 07105
Attorney for Petitioner

-- 1 of 2 --

Robert D. McCallum, Jr.
Assistant Attorney General
Civil Division
Donald E. Keener
Deputy Director
Michelle E. Gorden (Argued)
Senior Litigation Counsel
Michael P. Lindemann, Esquire
John D. Williams, Esquire
Office of Immigration Litigation
Civil Division, Department of Justice
P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044
Attorneys for Respondent
ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION
AMBRO, Circuit Judge:
It is now ordered that the published Opinion in the above
case filed January 23, 2004, be amended as follows:
On page 6 of the slip opinion, in the first full paragraph
(“In interpreting the scope of the DV Program. . . .”), the
penultimate sentence (which begins “If Congress had used
. . .”) is changed to delete the word “been”, such that the
sentence reads, “If Congress had used different language,
our analysis may be different.”
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
Dated: January 29, 2004
A True Copy:
Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
2

-- 2 of 2 --