Naviant Marketing Solutions, Inc v. Larry Tucker, Inc. Jeffrey W. Herrmann

023201a-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit14.08.2003

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
No. 02-3201
____________
NAVIANT MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC.
v.
LARRY TUCKER, INC.
JEFFREY W. HERRMANN; ROBERT D. ZATORSKI;
COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP,
Appellants
____________
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern of Pennsylvania
D.C. No.: 00-cv-6036
District Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
____________
O R D E R
____________
In order to correct a word-processing error, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the
captions of the opinion and judgment entered in the above-entitled appeal are amended to
reflect that the appeal came from the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania. Insofar as this amendment correcting a clerical error has no substantive
effect on the outcome of the appeal, any deadlines calculated from entry of the Court’s
judgment shall continue to be calculated from August 8, 2003 when the judgment was
initially entered.
For the Court,
Clerk
Dated: August 14, 2003

-- 1 of 2 --

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
____________
No. 02-3201
____________
NAVIANT MARKETING SOLUTIONS, INC.
v.
LARRY TUCKER, INC.,
JEFFREY W. HERRMANN; ROBERT D. ZATORSKI;
COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP,
Appellants
____________
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern of Pennsylvania
D.C. No.: 00-cv-6036
District Judge: Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
___________
Argued: July 15, 2003
Before: McKEE, BARRY, and ROSENN, Circuit Judges.
____________
AMENDED JUDGMENT
____________
This cause came to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was argued on July 15, 2003.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this
Court that the judgment of the District Court entered July 26, 2002, be, and the same is
hereby reversed. Costs taxed against appellee. All of the above in accordance with the
opinion of this Court.
ATTEST:
________________________________
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Dated: August 8, 2003 (as amended August 14, 2003)

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.