Marlene Garner v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY JO ANNE B. BARNHART {Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43 c }

013551mo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit21.03.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 01-3551
MARLENE GARNER,
Appellant
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
*JO ANNE B. BARNHART
*{Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 43(c)}
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(Dist. Court No. 00-1200)
District Court Judge: Gustave Diamond
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
March 7, 2002
Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, ALITO, and RENDELL, Circuit Judges.
(Opinion Filed: March 21, 2002)
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court affirming the decision
of an Administrative Law Judge, which denied Marlene Garner’s application for
supplemental security income under title XVI of the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C.
1381-1383f. On appeal to our Court, Garner contends that the decision of the
Administrative Law Judge is not supported by substantial evidence and that the
Administrative Law Judge committed a variety of other errors.
We have considered Garner’s arguments, and we conclude that the decision
of the Administrative Law Judge is supported by substantial evidence. We reject
Garner’s additional arguments.

-- 1 of 2 --

For these reasons, the decision of the District Court is affirmed.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.