United States of America v. FRANKLIN LUNA a/k/a MOON Franklin Luna

001156mo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit28.03.2002

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 00-1156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
FRANKLIN LUNA
a/k/a
MOON
Franklin Luna,
Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Criminal Action No. 99-cr-00273-2)
District Judge: Honorable Edmund V. Ludwig
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
February 25, 2002
Before: ROTH and FUENTES, Circuit Judges
GIBSON*, Circuit Judge
(Opinion filed March 28, 2002)
* Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior Circuit Court Judge for the Eighth Circuit,
sitting by designation.
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Franklin Luna appeals from a judgment of sentence in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On September 13, 1999, Luna
pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
846, and one count of aiding and abetting in the distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21
U.S.C. 841 (a)(1) & 18 U.S.C. 2. On February 3, 2000, Luna was sentenced to 87
months imprisonment and supervised release of five years.
Luna’s sole contention on appeal is that the District Court erred in applying a two
point sentencing enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a
weapon during the drug offense. In order for the enhancement to apply, the government
must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant possessed the weapon
and that the connection between the weapon and the drug offense was not clearly
improbable. See United States v. Price, 13 F.3d 711, 733 (3d Cir. 1994). From our
review of the record, we find that there was sufficient evidence before the District Court
to support its finding by a preponderance of the evidence that Luna was in possession of a
firearm at the time of the drug offense. Therefore, the District Court properly applied a
two point sentencing enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(b)(1).
For the foregoing reasons, we will affirm the judgment of sentence of the District
Court.

-- 1 of 2 --

TO THE CLERK:
Please file the foregoing Opinion.
By the Court,
/s/ Jane R. Roth
Circuit Judge

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.