TYRIQ S. WILSON, (Freedman) v. United States, State of Georgia, State of North Carolina, State of Virginia, State…

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
TYRIQ S. WILSON, (Freedman),
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF VIRGINIA, STATE
OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEKALB SHERIFF’S
FOUNDATION INC., COUNCIL OF MAGISTRATE
COURT JUDGES, INC., GEORGIA
CONFORMATION JUDGES ASSOCIATION INC.,
GWINNETT COUNTY POLICE FOUNDATION INC.,
ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION, INC., ATLANTA
POLICE ASSOCIATION INC., ATHENS-CLARKE
POLICE FOUNDATION, INC., GEORGIA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY HISTORICAL
SOCIETY, INC., TROOP C POST 9, TROOP A POST
28, STONE MOUNTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT,
STONE MOUNTAIN MUNICIPAL COURT,
GWINNETT COUNTY RECORDERS COURT,
GWINNETT COUNTY POLICE SOUTH PRECINCT,
OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
FOUNDATION INC., STATE HIGHWAY PATROL
TROOP G DISTRICT 6, DEPARTMENT OF STATE
POLICE STATE TROOPER, KING OF PRUSSIA
PSP TURNPIKE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE
DEPT., SHIRLENE PARKS, HILTON, CRUZ,
MARQUETTI, D. CLARK, TAYLOR, S. MAYE,
THOMAS KUSTRA, CHARLES E. BAILEY, BRIAN
K. ROSS, M. PEREZ, WESLEY G. PERSON,
Case: 24-2286 Document: 7 Page: 1 Filed: 01/14/2025

-- 1 of 3 --

WILSON v. US 2
UNKNOWN FEMALE CLERKS, M. WARE, D.
RANDALL BROWN, R. MASON, ERIC WAYNE
NORRIS, NOT DISCLOSED, JAMIE WILSON,
COURTNEY BARKER, ARRINGTON, JOHN K.
FINKBINER, CHRISTINE G. SCALISE, 5 OTHER
OFFICERS NOT LISTED,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2024-2286
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Georgia in No. 1:24-cv-03602-MLB,
Judge Michael Lawrence Brown.
______________________
Before D YK, C UNNINGHAM , and STARK, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Tyriq S. Wilson filed this civil action against the United
States, four states, and various state entities and individ-
uals, seeking $1 million in damages. On August 28, 2024,
Mr. Wilson filed a notice of appeal directed to this court.
On October 22, 2024, this court directed the parties to show
cause why this case should not be dismissed or transferred
for lack of jurisdiction. No party responded.1
This court’s jurisdiction to review district court cases is
generally limited to cases involving the patent laws, see 28
U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district
court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
1 After the notice of appeal was filed, the district
court entered its final judgment dismissing the case.
Case: 24-2286 Document: 7 Page: 2 Filed: 01/14/2025

-- 2 of 3 --

WILSON v. US 3
see § 1295(a)(4)(C); and cases involving certain damages
claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in
amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2).
This case does not fall within that jurisdiction. We thus
transfer to the United States Court of Appeals for the Elev-
enth Circuit, which would have jurisdiction over any ap-
peal from a final decision. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 41, 1291.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
This appeal and all case filings are transferred to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
January 14, 2025
Date
F OR THE COURT
Case: 24-2286 Document: 7 Page: 3 Filed: 01/14/2025

-- 3 of 3 --