Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Starlight Entertainment Enterprises, Inc., Sunset Housing Solutions, L.p.

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
STARLIGHT ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES,
INC., SUNSET HOUSING SOLUTIONS, L.P.,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2024-1989
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in No. 2:13-cv-09025-ODW-
AGR, Judge Otis D. Wright, II.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez moves for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis and to “correct the record” and “correct
[the] case title,” ECF No. 3 at 3. The court dismisses this
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Case: 24-1989 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/2024

-- 1 of 2 --

CALDERON LOPEZ v. SUNSET HOUSING SOLUTIONS, L. P. 2
On April 25, 2014, the district court dismissed Mr. Cal-
deron Lopez’s complaint seeking relief based on alleged vi-
olations relating to a purported lease agreement. On
June 11, 2024, Mr. Calderon Lopez filed a notice of appeal
seeking review of the “04/25/2014” decision. ECF No. 1-2
at 1.
“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case
is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S.
205, 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of ap-
peal must generally be filed within 30 days after entry of
final judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 2107; Fed. R. App. P. 4. Here,
Mr. Calderon Lopez’s notice of appeal, filed more than 10
years after the district court entered final judgment, is
clearly untimely. For at least this reason, we and any other
court of appeals lack jurisdiction.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The appeal is dismissed, and all pending motions
are denied.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
July 25, 2024
Date
F OR THE COURT
Case: 24-1989 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 07/25/2024

-- 2 of 2 --