Paul Anthony Aquino v. Mp 21 Soledad St Lp, Midpen Housing, Moongate Plaza

24-1973Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit27.02.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
PAUL ANTHONY AQUINO,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
MP 21 SOLEDAD ST LP, MIDPEN HOUSING,
MOONGATE PLAZA,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2024-1973
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in No. 2:24-cv-03500-KK-
ADS, Judge Kenly K. Kato.
______________________
Before TARANTO, STOLL, and STARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
Paul Anthony Aquino filed a complaint seeking
$100,000,000 for violations of his civil rights. The district
court denied Mr. Aquino’s in forma pauperis (IFP) motion
and dismissed the case with prejudice. Dkt. No. 5. Mr.
Aquino filed a notice of appeal directed to this court. In
view of the subject matter of the underlying case, this court
Case: 24-1973 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 02/27/2025

-- 1 of 2 --

AQUINO v. MP 21 SOLEDAD ST LP 2
directed the parties to show cause why this court has juris-
diction over the appeal. Neither party has responded.
This court’s jurisdiction to review district court cases is
generally limited to cases involving the patent laws, see 28
U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district
court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
see § 1295(a)(4)(C); and cases involving certain damages
claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in
amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2).
This case is outside of that limited subject matter jurisdic-
tion. We may transfer to another court, if it is in the inter-
est of justice, where “the action or appeal could have been
brought at the time it was filed.” 28 U.S.C. § 1631. Here,
the court concludes it appropriate to transfer to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The appeal and all its filings are transferred to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pur-
suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
February 27, 2025
Date
FOR THE COURT
Case: 24-1973 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 02/27/2025

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.