Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
2009-m904-7-31-09-1-pdf•Miscellaneous Docket No. 904 in Re Alphonso Scott v. Principi, case no. 98- 1073. Scott also moves for leave proceed in forma pauperis.…
2009-m904-7-31-09-1-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit31.07.2009
# NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 904 IN RE ALPHONSO SCOTT, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 98-1073, Judge Kenneth B. Kramer.
# ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Before MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
## ORDER
Alphonso Scott petitions for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States Court
of Appeals for Veterans Claims to reopen his case in Scott v. Principi, case no. 98-
1073. Scott also moves for leave proceed in forma pauperis.
On June 1, 1998, the Board of Veterans' Appeals denied Scott's claims for
service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and post-traumatic stress
disorder. After various proceedings, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered
final judgment on May 14, 2001, and issued its mandate on July 17, 2001. On
November 20, 2008, Scott attempted to file a motion in his closed case. In
correspondence dated February 9, 2009, the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
returned Scott's motion and informed him that his case was closed in July of 2001 and
he no longer had an appeal before that court. Scott then filed this petition for a writ of
mandamus.
<!-- PageBreak -->
The remedy of mandamus is available only in extraordinary situations to correct a
clear abuse of discretion or usurpation of judicial power. In re Calmar, Inc., 854 F.2d 461,
464 (Fed. Cir. 1988). A party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that it has no
other means of attaining the relief desired, Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Southern
Dist. of lowa, 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989), and that the right to issuance of the writ is "clear
and indisputable," Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980).
Based upon the papers submitted, Scott has not met his burden of showing
entitlement to a writ. Specifically, Scott has not shown a clear abuse of discretion or
usurpation of judicial power.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The petition is denied.
(2)
Scott's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.
FOR THE COURT
JUL 31 2009
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc:
Alphonso Scott
Jeanne E. Davidson, Esq.
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
s20
JUL 3 1 2009
JAN HŮŘBALY
CLERK
Misc. 904
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.