In re: VINODH RAGHUBIR v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2020…

N
OTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
In re: VINODH RAGHUBIR,
Petitioner
______________________

2020-128
______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00388-EGB, Senior
Judge Eric G. Bruggink.
______________________

ON PETITION
______________________

PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
Vinodh Raghubir currently has a case pending before
the United States Court of Federal Claims. He now peti-
tions for a writ of prohibition, asking this court to “prohibit
conduct pursuant to ‘the conspiracy to predetermine the
outcome of judicial proceedings’ throughout proceedings
now involving the Federal Court of Claims.”
Like a writ of mandamus, a writ of prohibition is a
drastic remedy that is available only when a petitioner has
a clear and indisputable right to relief and no adequate al-
ternative legal channels through which to obtain that re-
lief. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of
Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2020

IN RE: RAGHUBIR
2
Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004); In re Missouri, 664
F.2d 178, 180 (8th Cir. 1981). Mr. Raghubir has not
demonstrated that an appeal from an eventual final judg-
ment of the Court of Federal Claims would be inadequate
or that he has a clear and indisputable right to relief.
Accordingly,
I
T IS ORDERED THAT:
The petition is denied.

June 18, 2020
Date
FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

s24
Case: 20-128 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2020