Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
19-1158•Reinaldo Castillo, Gonzalo Padron Marino, Mayda Rotella, Julia Garcia, Shops on… v. United States
19-1158Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit06.03.2020
N
OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
REINALDO CASTILLO, GONZALO PADRON
MARINO, MAYDA ROTELLA, JULIA GARCIA,
SHOPS ON FLAGER INC., JOSE F. DUMENIGO,
DORA A. DUMENIGO, HUMBERTO J. DIAZ,
JOSEFA MARCIA DIAZ, LUIS CRESPO, JOSE LUIS
NAPOLE, GRACE BARSELLO NAPOLE,
BERNARDO D. MANDULEY, NORMA A.
MANDULEY, DANILO A. RODRIGUEZ, DORA
RODRIGUEZ, AVIMAEL AREVALO, ODALYS
AREVALO, DALIA ESPINOSA, DANIEL ESPINOSA,
SOFIRA GONZALEZ, LOURDEZ RODRIGUEZ,
ALBERTO PEREZ, MAYRA LOPEZ, NIRALDO
HERNANDEZ PADRON, MERCEDES ALINA
FALERO, LUISA PALENCIA, XIOMARA
RODRIGUEZ, HUGO E. DIAZ,
AND, CONCEPCION
V. DIAZ, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE DIAZ FAMILY
REVOCABLE TRUST, SOUTH AMERICAN TILE,
LLC, GLADYS HERNANDEZ, NELSON MENENDEZ,
JOSE MARTIN MARTINEZ, NORMA DEL
SOCORRO GOMEZ, OSVALDO BORRAS, JR., LUIS
R. SCHMIDT,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2019-1158
Case: 19-1158 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2020
CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES 2
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in Nos. 1:16-cv-01624-MBH, 1:17-cv-01931-MBH, Senior
Judge Marian Blank Horn.
______________________
ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
______________________
Before W
ALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
This court issued a precedential opinion in this case on
February 20, 2020. Castillo v. United States, __ F.3d __,
2020 WL 827856 (Fed. Cir. 2020). On March 4, 2020, the
government filed a petition for panel rehearing.
Accordingly,
I
T IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The petition for panel rehearing is granted for the
limited purpose of substituting the attached re-
vised opinion for the previously issued opinion.
2. The previous precedential opinion and judgment,
dated February 20, 2020, are hereby withdrawn
and replaced with the modified precedential opin-
ion and judgment attached to this order. The only
changes from the previously issued opinion are a
revision of the sentence now on page 4, lines 22–29,
and deletion of a phrase on page 7, line 22.
FOR THE COURT
March 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 19-1158 Document: 82 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2020
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.