Michael P. Edwards v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MICHAEL P. EDWARDS,
Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.
______________________
2013-7022
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 11-1993, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.
______________________
Decided: December 12, 2013
______________________
K ENNETH M. CARPENTER , Carpenter, Chartered, of
Topeka, Kansas, argued for claimant-appellant.
ELIZABETH M. H OSFORD, Trial Attorney, Commercial
Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depart-
ment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respond-
ent-appellee. On the brief were STUART F. D ELERY , Acting
Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON, Direc-
tor, and MARTIN F. HOCKEY , J R., Assistant Director. Of
counsel on the brief were D AVID J. BARRANS , Deputy
Assistant General Counsel and MARTIE ADELMAN, Attor-

-- 1 of 2 --

EDWARDS v. SHINSEKI 2
ney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of
Washington, DC. Of counsel was BRIAN D. G RIFFIN,
Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs,
of Washington, DC.
______________________
Before RADER, Chief Judge, L OURIE, and P ROST , Circuit
Judges.
RADER , Chief Judge.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims af-
firmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ determination that
Michael P. Edwards’ October 17, 2007 purported Notice of
Disagreement was invalid under pertinent VA regula-
tions. Because Mr. Edwards seeks review of issues of fact
and the application of law to fact beyond this court’s
statutory jurisdiction, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), this court
dismisses the appeal.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --