Power Management Solutions LLC v. Qualcomm Incorporated

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2013-1477
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 13-CV-0130, Judge Richard G.
Andrews.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before P ROST , O’MALLEY and T ARANTO, Circuit Judge.
T ARANTO, Circuit Judge.
O R D E R
The parties jointly move to affirm the judgment of the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
In addition to the complaint giving rise to this appeal,
Power Management Solutions LLC brought three other
Case: 13-1477 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 04/16/2014

-- 1 of 2 --

POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 2
relevant complaints in the District of Delaware, asserting
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,504,909. See Power
Management Solutions LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices
Inc., No. 2013-1455; Power Management Solutions LLC v.
NVIDIA Corp., No. 2013-1456; and Power Management
Solutions LLC v. Intel Corp. et al., No. 2013-1457 (collec-
tively, the “Related Cases”). In all three Related Cases,
the district court entered a stipulated judgment of nonin-
fringement, allowing Power Management to appeal from
adverse claim construction rulings.
In August 2013, while the Related Cases were on ap-
peal, the parties jointly moved to stay proceedings in this
case. The parties stipulated that, if this court were to
affirm the judgments in the Related Cases, this court
should affirm the judgment in this appeal. We granted
the parties’ motion to stay this appeal pending final
disposition of the Related Cases. Now that this court has
affirmed the judgments of the district court in the Related
Cases and the mandates have issued, we summarily
affirm the judgment of the district court in this case.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. The judgment of the Dis-
trict Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
s19
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 16, 2014
Case: 13-1477 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 04/16/2014

-- 2 of 2 --