Mondis Technology Ltd. v. Innolux Corporation ( Formerly Known As Chimei Innolux Corporation ) and Innolux Corp.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
INNOLUX CORPORATION ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS
C HIMEI INNOLUX C ORPORATION ) AND INNOLUX
CORP.,
Defendants,
AND
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.,
Movant-Appellant.
______________________
2013-1178
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0378, Judge J.
Rodney Gilstrap.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. With him

-- 1 of 2 --

on the brief were JEFFREY B. P LIES and VINCENT A.
G ALLO.
P ETER J. WIED, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles,
California, argued for movant-appellant. With him on the
brief were T ERRY D. G ARNETT , VINCENT K. YIP , and J AY C.
CHIU.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, P ROST , and T ARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
September 13, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --