Michael R. Lange, and Sky Robotics, Inc. v. Mark A. Litman, and Mark A. Litman & Associates, P.a.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MICHAEL R. LANGE, AND SKY ROBOTICS, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MARK A. LITMAN, AND MARK A. LITMAN &
ASSOCIATES, P.A.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
IPC EAGLE, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________
2012-1565
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota in No. 11-CV-2387, Judge Donovan
W. Frank.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before D YK, MAYER , and O'MALLEY , Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R

-- 1 of 2 --

MICHAEL R. LANGE v. MARK A. LITMAN 2
On March 11, 2013, appellees Mark A. Litman and
Mark A. Litman & Associates filed a motion seeking
reversal without oral argument and a remand with in-
structions to dismiss the plaintiff’s malpractice claims for
lack of jurisdiction. Appellants Michael R. Lange and Sky
Robotics, Inc., opposed.
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Gunn v.
Minton, 568 U.S. ___, 133 S.Ct. 1059 (2013), we conclude
that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the mal-
practice claims at issue. We vacate the district court’s
decision and remand to the district court. On remand the
district court shall dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint for
lack of jurisdiction.
F OR THE COURT
March 27, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Paul A. Sortland, Esq.
Charles E. Lundberg, Esq.

-- 2 of 2 --