USA v. Candice Nyeisha Adams

22-12310Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit29.03.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-12310
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CANDICE NYEISHA ADAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 0:21-cr-60325-RNS-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-12310 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/29/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-12310
Before NEWSOM, GRANT, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Philip Horowitz, appointed counsel for Candice Adams in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-12310 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 03/29/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.