USA v. Philip Fisher

22-11502Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit08.02.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11502
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PHILIP FISHER,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 6:19-cr-00251-PGB-LHP-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11502 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Order of the Court 22-11502
Before WILLIAM PRYOR , Chief Judge, and NEWSOM and G RANT, Cir-
cuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Truskoski, appointed counsel for Philip Fisher in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further repre-
sentation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the en-
tire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the en-
tire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and Fisher’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-11502 Document: 27-1 Date Filed: 02/08/2023 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.