USA v. Seth Kelly Gifford

22-11497Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit14.12.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 22-11497
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SETH KELLY GIFFORD,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 8:22-cr-00024-KKM-SPF-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 22-11497 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 12/14/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 22-11497
Before WILLIAM PRYOR , Chief Judge, WILSON, and L UCK , Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mark Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Seth Kelly Gifford in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gifford’s revocation of supervised
release and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 22-11497 Document: 24-1 Date Filed: 12/14/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.