USA v. Steven J. McLendon

21-11704Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit10.01.2022

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 21-11704
Non-Argument Calendar
____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVEN J. MCLENDON,
Defendant-Appellant.
____________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 3:20-cr-00048-TKW-1
____________________
USCA11 Case: 21-11704 Date Filed: 01/10/2022 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2 Opinion of the Court 21-11704
Before WILSON, B RASHER , and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Hendrix, appointed counsel for Steven McLendon
in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED, and McLendon’s conviction and sen-
tence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 21-11704 Date Filed: 01/10/2022 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.