USA v. Craigory Reeves

20-13553Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit18.03.2021

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 20-13553
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cr-556-VMC-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CRAIGORY REEVES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 18, 2021)
Before JORDAN, GRANT, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David Little, appointed counsel for Craigory Reeves in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Reeves and filed a
USCA11 Case: 20-13553 Date Filed: 03/18/2021 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
brief based on Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review
of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the
appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Reeves’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
USCA11 Case: 20-13553 Date Filed: 03/18/2021 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.