Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
17-12019•USA v. Roderick Norfus
17-12019Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit26.01.2018
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-12019
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:16-cr-80134-DTKH-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODERICK NORFUS
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(January 26, 2018)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, FAY and HULL, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal
waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert,
997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced
if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d
Case: 17-12019 Date Filed: 01/26/2018 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
2
1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by
comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Rubbo, 396 F.3d
1330, 1334 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Plea bargains . . . are like contracts and should be
interpreted in accord with what the parties intended.”).
Case: 17-12019 Date Filed: 01/26/2018 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.