Arnaldo Ravelo v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), et al

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10337
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-23047-MGC
ARNALDO RAVELO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS),
Randall Akins, Kendall Field Office,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Jeh Johnson, Secretary,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(December 13, 2017)
Case: 17-10337 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before HULL, DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,* Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-Appellant Arnaldo Ravelo brought this civil action under 5 U.S.C.
§ 701 et seq. and 28 U.S.C. § 1331. After review and with the benefit of oral
argument, this Court concludes that Ravelo has not shown any reversible error in
the district court’s final judgment and order dated November 30, 2016. Thus, we
affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons already outlined in the district
court’s order.1
AFFIRMED.
*
Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the United States Court of International Trade,
sitting by designation.
1 This Court sua sponte has considered its jurisdiction and concludes that, based on the
record and the narrow issue of statutory ineligibility for adjustment of status to that of a lawful
permanent resident, we have subject matter jurisdiction in this case. See Perez v. U.S. Bureau of
Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 774 F.3d 960, 965–66 (11th Cir. 2014); Mejia Rodriguez v.
U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 562 F.3d 1137, 1142–43 (11th Cir. 2009).
Case: 17-10337 Date Filed: 12/13/2017 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --