USA v. Geminas Brown

13-13377Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit08.07.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13377
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00257-JDW-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GEMINAS BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 8, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Geminas Brown in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-13377 Date Filed: 07/08/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-13377 Date Filed: 07/08/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.