USA v. Roderick Monroe

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-10460
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00100-GKS-TBS-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RODERICK MONROE, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 29, 2013)
Before CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles E. Taylor, appointed counsel for Roderick Monroe in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
Case: 13-10460 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Monroe’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case: 13-10460 Date Filed: 08/29/2013 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --