USA v. Anthony Lamar Winston

12-14765Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16.04.2014

Gesamter Gesetzestext

[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-14765
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00034-WHA-TFM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY LAMAR WINSTON,
a.k.a. June Boy,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
_________________________
(April 16, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Goggans, appointed counsel for Anthony Lamar Winston in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 12-14765 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2

-- 1 of 2 --

2
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winston=s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED. Winston’s motion for appointment of new counsel is
DENIED as moot.
Case: 12-14765 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 2 of 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.