Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-15312•Cyrus Vance v. USA, et al.
11-15312Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit06.08.2012
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15312
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cv-61745-KAM
CYRUS VANCE,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l lPetitioner-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN,
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Respondents-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(August 6, 2012)
Before PRYOR, FAY, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Cyrus Vance, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his petition for
Case: 11-15312 Date Filed: 08/06/2012 Page: 1 of 2
-- 1 of 2 --
a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The government argues, and Vance
concedes, that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to entertain the
petition because “[s]ection 2241 petitions may be brought only in the district court
for the district in which the inmate is incarcerated.” Fernandez v. United States,
941 F.2d 1488, 1495 (11th Cir. 1991). The district court lacked jurisdiction over
Vance’s petition because Vance is not incarcerated in that district. We vacate the
order that denied Vance’s petition and remand with instructions to dismiss
Vance’s petition for lack of jurisdiction.
VACATED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.
2
Case: 11-15312 Date Filed: 08/06/2012 Page: 2 of 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.