Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
11-15023•Michael Bradford v. Darius J. Harrison, et al.
11-15023Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit27.06.2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JUNE 27, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15023
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cv-00156-JEC
MICHAEL BRADFORD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DWAYNE CARTER,
a.k.a. Lil Wayne, et al.,
Defendants,
DARIUS J. HARRISON, a.k.a. Deezel,
BMI, INC.,
DWAYNE MICHAEL CARTER, JR.,
a.k.a. Lil Wayne,
BOBBY MARCEL WILSON,
a.k.a. Bobby Valentino,
CASH MONEY RECORDS, INC., et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(June 27, 2012)
-- 1 of 2 --
Before BARKETT, PRYOR, and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court dismissed Michael Bradford’s civil action with prejudice
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), denying in the same order Bradford’s motion to
dismiss without prejudice. Bradford appeals. He contends that the district court
abused its discretion in dismissing with prejudice and in denying his request for
dismissal without prejudice. (R.1-169.)
This litigation spanned about two years and eight months. Misconduct by one
of Bradford’s former attorneys is not disputed. And, misconduct by Bradford himself
has support in the record. We conclude that Bradford has not shown that the district
court abused its discretion in dismissing the action with prejudice.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.