USA v. Rubiela Vargas Ortiz

11-13801Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit17.02.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 17, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13801
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:09-cr-60143-WJZ-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUBIELA VARGAS ORTIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(February 17, 2012)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

-- 1 of 2 --

Robin J. Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Rubiela Vargas Ortiz in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ortiz’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.