USA v. Datrist McCall

11-13526Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit07.02.2012

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEBRUARY 7, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-13526
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00019-WKW-SRW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DATRIST MCCALL,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Alabama
_________________________
(February 7, 2012)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel G. Hamm, appointed counsel for Datrist McCall in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

-- 1 of 2 --

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McCall’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.