USA v. Joe Nathan Morgan

11-10511Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit17.11.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
NOVEMBER 17, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-10511
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00007-WLS-TQL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOE NATHAN MORGAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Georgia
_________________________
(November 17, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Gerald B. Williams, appointed counsel for Joe Nathan Morgan in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

-- 1 of 2 --

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Morgan’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.