Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-15637•USA v. Christopher Michael Stanton, a.k.a. Christopher Stanton
10-15637Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit30.05.2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 30, 2012
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-15637
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:06-cr-00011-LC-MD-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL STANTON,
a.k.a. Christopher Stanton,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(May 30, 2012)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Christopher Stanton in this direct
-- 1 of 2 --
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87
S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues
of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Stanton’s convictions
and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.