Brooks v. The Hartford Insurance Company

10-15308Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit29.04.2011

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APR 29, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-15308
Non-Argument Calendar
D. C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02835-HLM
ETHEL BROOKS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
(April 29, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court, in its order of October 13, 2010, dismissed the plaintiff’s
complaint for failure to state a claim for relief because the complaint was not

-- 1 of 2 --

brought within the two-year limitations period contained in the insurance policy
defendant issued plaintiff. Plaintiff now appeals. We find no error in the court’s
rationale for dismissing the complaint. The court’s judgment is therefore
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.