Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-15196•Adolfus O'Brien Giles vs Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
10-15196Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit16.05.2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 16, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-15196
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:10-cv-00042-CDL
ADOLFUS O’BRIEN GILES,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(May 16, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Adolfus Giles appeals pro se the dismissal with prejudice of his complaint
of employment discrimination against Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. The district
-- 1 of 2 --
court ruled that Giles’s complaint is barred by res judicata. Giles filed, in the same
court, the same complaint against the same defendant a year earlier, and we
affirmed the dismissal of that complaint. Giles v. Wal-Mart Distribution Ctr., No.
09-14223 (11th Cir. Dec. 28, 2009). Giles’s second complaint is clearly barred by
res judicata. We affirm.
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.