Campbell v. E. M. Security

10-13018Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit17.12.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DEC 17, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-13018
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cv-00078-BAE-GRS
GERALD CARMICHEAL CAMPBELL,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
versus
E. M. SECURITY,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 17, 2010)
Before BLACK, BARKETT and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Campbell appeals the district court’s dismissal of his employment
discrimination suit. Campbell challenges the court’s denial of his request for

-- 1 of 2 --

appointed counsel. However, Campbell’s request was moot because his Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission complaint was untimely—well beyond the
180-day limit. Equitable tolling was inapplicable to this deadline because
Campbell did not provide any reason for his late filing. See Zipes v. Trans World
Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 398 (1982). Thus, the court correctly dismissed his
case and denied his request for counsel as moot.
AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.