Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
10-12533•Laura Faught, et al. v. American Home Shield Corporation
10-12533Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit26.10.2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCTOBER 26, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-12533
D. C. Docket No. 2:07-cv-01928-RDP
LAURA FAUGHT,
STEVEN FAUGHT,
on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
JOHN HOWE, et al.,
Intervenors-Plaintiffs,
MIRIAM CHAPON,
JOHN CHAPON,
Intervenor-Plaintiffs-
Appellants,
versus
AMERICAN HOME SHIELD CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee,
TODD PETTITT,
SHARON LEE,
Interested-Parties-Appellants.
-- 1 of 3 --
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
(October 26, 2011)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, CARNES, Circuit Judge, and SANDS, District*
Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Consolidated Objecting Class Members (the “objectors”) appeal the district
court’s order denying an award of attorneys’ fees and costs.
Even putting aside timeliness issues presented by the Appellees, the
objectors are entitled to attorneys’ fees only in the event that they can show either
(1) that they conferred some benefit on the class or (2) that they substantially
improved the settlement under consideration. See, e.g., Uselton v. Commercial
Lovelace, Inc., 9 F.3d 849, 855 (10th Cir. 1993); City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.,
560 F.2d 1093, 1098 (2d Cir. 1977). The burden is on the objectors to show one
of these criteria has been met. The district court, in a well reasoned opinion,
concluded that they had not carried that burden.
Honorable W. Louis Sands, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia,*
sitting by designation.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
This court reviews such findings for abuse of discretion. Haitian Refugee
Ctr. v. Meese, 791 F.2d 1489, 1496 (11th Cir. 1986). The district court laid out in
detail how the objectors’ claims were based on speculation that is unsupported by
the record. We agree with these findings; therefore, we conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion and affirm the denial of attorneys’ fees and costs.
AFFIRMED.
3
-- 3 of 3 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.