Gesamter Gesetzestext
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DECEMBER 2, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-12499
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:06-cr-80183-DMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SUPREME SCOTT,
a.k.a. Walter Scott,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(December 2, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Steven Kassner, counsel for Supreme Scott in this direct criminal appeal, has
moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his
-- 1 of 2 --
opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because review of
the issues raised by Scott and counsel, as well as an independent review of the record
as a whole, reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Scott’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
