USA v. Harold

10-10738Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit22.09.2010

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPT 22, 2010
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 10-10738
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:97-cr-00314-HES-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLAUDE N. HAROLD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 22, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Claude N. Harold in this appeal
from the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and subsequent imposition of

-- 1 of 2 --

an 11-month sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Harold’s
supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.