Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-15831•USA v. Mitchell Kent Jackson
09-15831Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit02.02.2011
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FEB 2, 2011
JOHN LEY
CLERK
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 09-15831
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00225-CR-1-KD-B
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MITCHELL KENT JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(February 2, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Mitchell Kent Jackson, has filed a
-- 1 of 2 --
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Jackson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.