PERB Decision No. 1000EA•Los Angeles Unified School District (Watts) (PERB 1000EA)
Los Angeles Unified School District (Watts) (PERB 1000EA)
PERB Decision No. 1000EACalperb01.09.1993
Gesamter Gesetzestext
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DECISION OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD HOWARD 0. WATTS, Complainant, v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent. ) Case No. LA-PN-126 Request for Reconsideration PERB Decision No. 1000 PERB Decision No. 1000a September 1, 1993 ) ) ) Appearance: Howard 0. Watts, on his own behalf. Before Blair, Chair; Hesse and Caffrey, Members. DECISION BLAIR, Chair: This case is before the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB or Board) on a request for reconsideration filed by Howard O. Watts (Watts) of the Board's decision in Los Angeles Unified School District (Watts) (1993) PERB Decision No. 1000. In that decision, the Board affirmed the Board agent's dismissal of Watts' public notice complaint which alleged that the Los Angeles Unified School District (District) violated section 3547(b) of the Educational Employment Relations Act (EERA)1 by: (1) failing to adequately inform the public of the 1EERA is codified at Government Code section 3540 et seq. Section 3547 states, in pertinent part: (b) Meeting and negotiating shall not take place on any proposal until a reasonable time has elapsed after the submission of the proposal to enable the public to become informed and the public has the opportunity to express itself regarding the proposal at a meeting of the public school employer. ) ) ) ) ) ) ______________ )
District's initial proposals; (2) failing to give the public a full opportunity to express their views; (3) failing to timely post the initial proposals; and (4) improperly adopting the initial proposals. DISCUSSION PERB Regulation 32410(a)2 states, in pertinent part: The grounds for requesting reconsideration are limited to claims that the decision of the Board itself contains prejudicial errors of fact, or newly discovered evidence or law which was not previously available and could not have been discovered with the exercise of reasonable diligence. Watts has failed to provide any evidence showing prejudicial error and has not presented any newly discovered evidence or law which was not previously available. ORDER The request for reconsideration of Los Angeles Unified School District (Watts) (1993) PERB Decision No. 1000 is hereby DENIED. Members Hesse and Caffrey joined in this Decision. 2PERB regulations are codified at California Code of Regulations, title 8, section 31001 et seq. 22
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.