United Teachers-Los Angeles (Farrar) (PERB 0797EA)

PERB Decision No. 0797EACalperb07.05.1990

Gesamter Gesetzestext

STATE 	OF 	CALIFORNIA
DECISION OF 	THE
PUBLIC 	EMPLOYMENT 	RELATIONS 	BOARD
WILLIAM G. 	FARRAR, 	JR.,
Charging 	Party,
v.
UNITED TEACHERS-LOS ANGELES,
Respondent.
Case No. 	LA-CO-485
Request 	for 	Reconsideration
PERB Decision No. 	797
PERB Decision No. 	797a
May 7, 	1990
Appearances: 	William G. 	Farrar, 	Jr., 	on his own behalf; 	Law
Offices of Lawrence B. 	Trygstad by Richard J. 	Schwab, 	Attorney,
for United Teachers-Los Angeles.
Before Craib, 	Shank and Camilli, 	Members.
DECISION
CAMILLI, 	Member: 	This case is before the Public Employment
Relations 	Board 	(PERB or Board) 	on a 	request 	for reconsideration
by William G. 	Farrar, 	Jr. 	(Farrar) 	of the Board's decision in
United Teachers-Los Angeles 	(Farrar) 	(1990) 	PERB Decision
No. 797.
DISCUSSION
PERB Regulation 32410 	states, 	in pertinent part, 	as 	follows:
. 	. 	. 	The grounds for requesting
reconsideration are 	limited 	to 	claims 	that
the decision of 	the 	Board 	itself 	contains
prejudicial errors of 	fact, 	or newly
discovered 	evidence 	or 	law which was 	not
previously 	available 	and 	could 	not 	have 	been
discovered with 	the 	exercise 	of 	reasonable
diligence.
As 	a basis 	for his 	request, 	Farrar claims 	that the
restatement of his allegations 	in PERB Decision No. 	797 	contains
prejudicial 	errors 	of 	fact, 	including the omission of 	certain
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
______________ )
allegations. 	However, 	a comparison of the statement of
allegations 	contained in PERB Decision No. 	797 	and the
allegations 	as 	stated 	in the request 	for reconsideration reveals
no material difference. 	In addition, 	Farrar has 	failed to
explain, 	nor is 	it apparent, 	how the purported errors 	of 	fact
could have been prejudicial. 	Therefore, 	we 	find no basis 	for
reconsideration of PERB Decision No. 	797.
ORDER
In accordance with PERB Regulation 	32410, 	the request 	for
reconsideration of PERB Decision No. 	797 	is hereby DENIED.
Members 	Craib and Shank 	joined 	in this 	Decision.
2
2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.