Angelo L. Harrington v. State of Arkansas

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 159
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION III
No. CR-23-795

ANGELO L. HARRINGTON Opinion Delivered March 12, 2025

APPELLANT
APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,
V. GREENWOOD DISTRICT
[NO. 66GCR-17-169]
STATE OF ARKANSAS
APPELLEE HONORABLE R. GUNNER DELAY,
JUDGE

DISMISSED

CASEY R. TUCKER, Judge

The Circuit Court of Sebastian County denied Angelo Harrington’s petition for

credit for additional time served by order entered September 21, 2023. Harrington appeals,

asserting that the circuit court erred in not giving him credit for 700 days spent in federal

detention in Oklahoma for separate offenses. We dismiss.

On November 24, 2021, Harrington entered a negotiated plea of guilty to offenses

committed on August 14, 2017, in Sebastian County, Arkansas. Those offenses were

simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms; trafficking methamphetamine; possession of

heroin with the purpose to deliver, greater than twenty-eight grams; conspiracy to commit

delivery of methamphetamine; and possession of drug paraphernalia to pack or repack

methamphetamine or cocaine. Harrington was sentenced as a habitual offender to 180
months’ imprisonment to be followed by 300 months’ suspended imposition of sentence.

Notably, the circuit court filed the sentencing order on December 1, 2021.

Meanwhile, on March 26, 2019, Harrington committed the offenses of possession of

methamphetamine with intent to distribute and unlawful use of controlled substance while

in possession of firearms in Oklahoma. He was sentenced on August 16, 2021, in the United

States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma to a 120-month term of

imprisonment. The federal district court gave Harrington credit for the 719 days he had

already served in federal custody.

On August 22, 2023, back in Sebastian County Circuit Court, Harrington filed a

petition to receive 700 days’ credit for the time spent in federal custody. The court denied

Harrington’s petition, and this appeal followed.

Harrington’s petition for credit for time served was untimely. A request for credit for

time served in custody is a request to modify a sentencing order imposed in an illegal manner.

Perez v. State, 2015 Ark. 120 (per curiam). As such, the request must be raised in a petition

filed pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. Id. Rule 37.2(c) of the Arkansas

Rules of Criminal Procedure provides the guidelines for commencing proceedings under

Rule 37.1. It states that in cases such as the one before us, in which the petitioner entered

a negotiated plea of guilty, the petition must be filed within ninety days of the entry of the

judgment. Ark. R. Crim. P 37.2; Perez, supra. The time limitations imposed in Rule 37.2 are

jurisdictional in nature, and if not met, the trial court lacks jurisdiction to grant the relief

sought. Tolliver v. State, 2016 Ark. 111, 486 S.W.3d 199; Woods v. State, 2017 Ark. 5 (per

2
curiam); Perez, supra. When the lower court loses jurisdiction, the appellate court lacks

jurisdiction as well. Perez, supra.

In the present case, Harrington filed his petition in Sebastian County Circuit Court

over a year and eight months after the court’s entry of the judgment. This failure to file the

petition within ninety days deprived the circuit court of jurisdiction to act. Thus, this court

is without jurisdiction. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

HARRISON and THYER, JJ., agree.

Angelo L. Harrington, pro se appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: A. Evangeline Bacon, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

3