Kernrechtsfrage
Whether revision should be admitted because the case raises a question of fundamental importance regarding a regulation that indirectly refers to a private technical standard protected by copyright and accessible only for a fee.
Extrahierter Entscheid
Yes. The complaint was well-founded because the case may clarify whether, and under what conditions, such an indirect reference satisfies the constitutional and statutory requirements for proper promulgation of legal norms.
Extrahierte Begründung
The court considered the unresolved question of law capable of clarification in revision proceedings and therefore found a ground for admission under the fundamental-importance criterion.