Kernrechtsfrage
Whether the case raises a question of fundamental importance justifying admission of revision, namely whether one authority may invoke legitimate expectations against another authority's withdrawal of an unlawful subsidy decision.
Extrahierter Entscheid
The complaint succeeds because the case presents a question of fundamental importance requiring clarification in revision.
Extrahierte Begründung
It remains to be clarified whether a municipality may rely on legitimate expectations when a Land authority withdraws an unlawful subsidy decision and departs from an earlier administrative practice agreed upon by both authorities to ensure legal certainty. The court also notes that this raises the additional question whether such an agreement qualifies as a public-law settlement under § 55 VwVfG and what legal consequences would follow.