Appeal costs in trademark proceedings require special reasons

BPatG 30 W (pat) 20/14Bundespatentgericht / Division 3023.06.2016Dismissed

Zusammenfassung

In this trademark appeal, the Federal Patent Court dealt solely with costs. It held that there were no reasons to deviate from the general rule under § 71(1) sentence 1 MarkenG and impose appeal costs on one party. The decision therefore left the parties to bear their own costs in the appeal proceedings.

Regest

§ 71 Abs. 1 S. 1 MarkenG; appeal costs in trademark proceedings: an order allocating costs to one party requires special reasons. In the absence of such reasons, the general rule applies that no costs are imposed on the unsuccessful party; each party bears its own costs. The mere fact that a party is unsuccessful does not suffice for a cost order. The court will only depart from the rule where the conduct of a party or other circumstances make a cost order equitable (consid. implicit).

Gesamter Gesetzestext

BPatG — 30 W (pat) 20/14, Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-23

Aktenzeichen: 30 W (pat) 20/14

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Normen: § 71 Abs 1 S 1 MarkenG

Spruchkörper: 30. Senat

Titelzeile

Markenbeschwerdeverfahren – Kostenentscheidung im Beschwerdeverfahren – keine Gründe für Kostenauferlegung

Schlagwörter

trademark appealcostscost allocationspecial reasonsappeal proceedings