Non-admission of constitutional complaint on rehabilitation decision

BVerfG 1 BvR 2436/10Bverfg / 1. Senat 2. Kammer04.07.2013Inadmissible

Zusammenfassung

The Federal Constitutional Court, sitting as a chamber, issued a non-reasoned decision not to accept the constitutional complaint. The complaint concerned the legal effect and scope of an administrative rehabilitation notice under rehabilitation law. The challenged lower-court decisions were the Federal Administrative Court's order of 15 July 2010 and the Magdeburg Administrative Court's judgment of 10 November 2009.

Regest

§ 93d Abs. 1 S. 3 BVerfGG; non-admission of a constitutional complaint by chamber order without reasons. Where the chamber does not accept a constitutional complaint for decision, the complaint is not examined on the merits and no substantive constitutional assessment is provided. The non-admission order is a procedural disposition ending the proceedings at the constitutional court level; it does not imply a merits ruling on the challenged lower-court decisions or on the underlying administrative-law question.

Gesamter Gesetzestext

BVerfG — 1 BvR 2436/10, Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-07-04

Aktenzeichen: 1 BvR 2436/10

Dokumenttyp: Kammerbeschluss ohne Begründung

Normen: § 93d Abs 1 S 3 BVerfGG, § 1 Abs 7 VermG

Vorinstanz: vorgehend BVerwG, 15. Juli 2010, Az: 8 B 4/10, Beschlussvorgehend VG Magdeburg, 10. November 2009, Az: 5 A 306/08 MD, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 1. Senat 2. Kammer

Titelzeile

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Verwaltungsrechtliche Rehabilitierung - Wirkung und Reichweite des Rehabilitierungsbescheids

Schlagwörter

constitutional complaintnon-admissionrehabilitationadministrative lawprocedural decision