BAG 3 AZR 195/15•BAG overturns LAG, dismisses pension claim
BAG 3 AZR 195/15Bag / 3. Abteilung07.06.2016Modified
Von Omnilex extrahiert
In this employment case, the Federal Labour Court dealt with the defendant's revision and the claimant's revision against the Cologne labour courts' judgments. The Senate, with the parties having waived findings of fact and reasons, granted the defendant's revision, set aside the Regional Labour Court judgment in the relevant part, amended the Labour Court judgment insofar as it had upheld the claim, and dismissed the action in full. The claimant's revision was rejected, and the claimant was ordered to bear the costs.
§ 313a ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons; revision in labour proceedings. Where the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons, the judgment may be rendered in shortened form. If the revision of the defendant succeeds, the appellate judgment is to be quashed to the extent it maintained the claim, the first-instance judgment amended accordingly, and the action dismissed in full; a concurrent revision by the claimant is to be rejected if it does not affect the dispositive outcome. Costs follow the losing party.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-07
Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 195/15
ECLI: ECLI:DE:BAG:2016:070616.U.3AZR195.15.0
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Köln, 9. Mai 2014, Az: 19 Ca 43/13, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 15. Januar 2015, Az: 8 Sa 83/15, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 3. Senat
Auf die Revision der Beklagten zu 1. wird - unter Zurückweisung der Revision des Klägers - das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 15. Januar 2015 - 8 Sa 83/15 - aufgehoben, soweit das Landesarbeitsgericht die Berufung der Beklagten zu 1. gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Köln vom 9. Mai 2014 - 19 Ca 43/13 - zurückgewiesen hat.
Auf die Berufung der Beklagten zu 1. wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Köln vom 9. Mai 2014 - 19 Ca 43/13 - abgeändert, soweit es der Klage stattgegeben hat.
Die Klage wird insgesamt abgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .
| Zwanziger | Spinner | Ahrendt | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schultz | Schepers |
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the defendant's revision should succeed against the LAG judgment upholding the claim
The defendant's revision succeeded; the LAG judgment was quashed to the extent it had rejected the defendant's appeal.
The Senate disposed of the case without factual findings or detailed reasons, and ultimately found no basis to uphold the claimant's request.
Whether the claimant's revision should succeed
The claimant's revision was rejected.
The claimant's challenge did not change the outcome reached on appeal; the claim failed in full.
Whether the claim should be granted on the merits
The claim was dismissed in its entirety.
After allowing the defendant's appeal and modifying the first-instance judgment, the court found the claim unfounded.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.