BAG 4 AZR 261/09•Revision dismissed in employment dispute
BAG 4 AZR 261/09Bag / 4. Abteilung15.12.2010Dismissed
Von Omnilex extrahiert
The Federal Labour Court (4th Senate) dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Saxony-Anhalt Regional Labour Court judgment in an employment dispute. The court’s short form decision notes that, in view of the leading parallel case, the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons. The only operative holdings are dismissal of the revision and allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings to the plaintiff.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: In cases connected with a leading parallel proceeding, the court may dispense with findings of fact and reasons where the procedural prerequisites are met. The short-form judgment remains sufficient if the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons in accordance with the statutory framework; the operative part is limited to the disposition on the appeal and costs. The revision is dismissed where no further relief is granted in the appellate instance.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-12-15
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 261/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Stendal, 22. Januar 2008, Az: 2 Ca 924/07, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Sachsen-Anhalt, 22. Januar 2009, Az: 7 Sa 68/08, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Sachsen-Anhalt vom 22. Januar 2009 - 7 Sa 68/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 256/09 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Bepler | Creutzfeldt | Winter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pfeil | Bredendiek |
Von Omnilex extrahiert
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the regional labour court judgment should be upheld
The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.
The decision is recorded as having been rendered without a statement of facts or reasons in view of the leading parallel case; no further substantive reasoning is provided in the text supplied.
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.